By Swapnil B. Walunj (PGP2007)
1) What is Capital Account Convertibility?
According to the Tarapore committee set up by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in 1997, Capital account convertibility (CAC) refers to the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign financial assets and vice versa at market determined rates of exchange. It is associated with changes of ownership in foreign/domestic financial assets and liabilities and embodies the creation and liquidation of claims on, or by, the rest of the world.
As of today, there exists restricted capital account convertibility in our country. By this any Indian entity (individual, company or otherwise) can invest or acquire assets outside India or a foreign entity remit funds for investment or acquisition of assets with a specified `cap' on such investments and for specific purpose.
2) How is CAC different from current account convertibility?
Current account convertibility allows free inflows and outflows for all purposes other than for capital purposes such as investments and loans. In other words, it allows residents to make and receive trade-related payments — receive dollars (or any other foreign currency) for export of goods and services and pay dollars for import of goods and services, make sundry remittances, access foreign currency for travel, studies abroad, medical treatment and gifts etc. In India, current account convertibility was established with the acceptance of the obligations under Article VIII of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement in August 1994
3) What if we have full Capital Account Convertibility?
A full convertibility means movement of funds in and out of India without any restrictions and `no questions asked' basis. This would mean that anybody could approach a bank and instruct it to transfer money anywhere (exception will be the restricted countries and/or the regions specified from time to time) and allow banks to receive funds from any entity from abroad for credit as per instructions of the remitter. It would also mean that a domestic individual can pay in foreign currency for purchases in India - rupee or US dollar or euro or yen will mean the same. Thus it increases one’s ability to hold his cash in foreign currency.
4) Will it make the money laundering easier? Are there any restrictions?
Making the currency fully convertible does not mean encouraging movement of money obtained from dubious means. All inflows or outflows of money are subject to know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) guidelines.
The remitting Bank should ensure that the remitter is KYC-compliant and the funds comply with AML guidelines. Similarly the beneficiary Bank should also ensure compliance to KYC of the recipient of the remittance.
The freedom of movement of money is now restricted to the sector and quantum. For example, the FII investment in GOI bonds is capped at $2 billion; foreign holding in any domestic entity is restricted to 74 per cent, no FDI into retail space etc. The freedom will mean that one can use legitimate rupee resources for investment in foreign country and a legitimate foreign company can acquire business in India without any restrictions on specific sector or quantum of investment.
The remitting Bank should ensure that the remitter is KYC-compliant and the funds comply with AML guidelines. Similarly the beneficiary Bank should also ensure compliance to KYC of the recipient of the remittance.
The freedom of movement of money is now restricted to the sector and quantum. For example, the FII investment in GOI bonds is capped at $2 billion; foreign holding in any domestic entity is restricted to 74 per cent, no FDI into retail space etc. The freedom will mean that one can use legitimate rupee resources for investment in foreign country and a legitimate foreign company can acquire business in India without any restrictions on specific sector or quantum of investment.
5) How will it help Indian Rupee and Indian economy?
Since rupee is not fully convertible, it is of no value - whereas US dollar, pound sterling, euro, Singapore dollar, Malaysian ringitt, Yen etc are accepted. Rupee as a convertible currency will be accepted in a convertible as well as non-convertible country. Fuller convertibility is expected to facilitate double-digit growth through higher investment and improve efficiency in financial sector through greater competition.
6) Any potential dangers?
Following the East Asian crisis, even the most ardent votaries of CAC in the World Bank and the IMF realised that the dangers of going in for CAC without adequate preparation could be catastrophic. Since then the received wisdom has been to move slowly but cautiously towards CAC with priority being accorded to fiscal consolidation and financial sector reform above all else.
The combined deficit of the governments was 7.7% of GDP in 2005-06, one of the highest in the world. Indian law stipulates fiscal deficit must fall by 0.3 percentage points a year until 2009 and while it has shrunk recently this is due more to high growth than budget discipline. Public finances are a case in point. The country runs a revenue deficit and a high fiscal deficit, making it vulnerable to shocks when foreign capital is allowed to enter and leave freely.
The combined deficit of the governments was 7.7% of GDP in 2005-06, one of the highest in the world. Indian law stipulates fiscal deficit must fall by 0.3 percentage points a year until 2009 and while it has shrunk recently this is due more to high growth than budget discipline. Public finances are a case in point. The country runs a revenue deficit and a high fiscal deficit, making it vulnerable to shocks when foreign capital is allowed to enter and leave freely.
7) The roadmap ahead:-
The road map, released recently, was drawn up by an expert panel appointed by the central bank and outlines a three-phase plan extending to 2010-11 to allow greater movement of capital in and out of the local currency. The panel recommended that before achieving fuller capital account convertibility the central bank needed a more transparent exchange rate policy, the government should lower its stakes in state-run banks and measures should be taken to discourage overly high investment by foreign funds.
But analysts say the panel's suggestion that government's share in state-run banks should fall to 33% from 51% will fall foul of the ruling coalition's communist allies. The communists, whose main backers are trade unions, fear loss of state control will lead to job cuts. Probably the government would make the state-run banks stronger, may be through mergers, to face competition when fuller convertibility comes in. The report also said industrial houses should be allowed to set up private sector banks.
But analysts say the panel's suggestion that government's share in state-run banks should fall to 33% from 51% will fall foul of the ruling coalition's communist allies. The communists, whose main backers are trade unions, fear loss of state control will lead to job cuts. Probably the government would make the state-run banks stronger, may be through mergers, to face competition when fuller convertibility comes in. The report also said industrial houses should be allowed to set up private sector banks.
References: 1) http://www.economictimes.com/